being multiliterate

To survive in this new world, it is important to be multiliterate. Whilst new technologies have been heralded by many as “the totem of educational change” (Drenoyianni, 2006, p.401) and the solution to a variety of educational problems (Cuban 1986), other research indicates that their effectiveness as a learning tool relies on the pedagogy, teaching methods, curriculum and context in which they are used (Peck, Cuban & Kirkpatrick, 2002; Tsiakalos, 2002, as cited by Drenoyianni, 2006). Peck et al.’s (2002) study recognized the potential for improving educational outcomes, but found very few teachers capitalising on this potential…

Saville, M. (2010). Robotics as a Vehicle for Multiliteracies. In D. Pullen & D. Cole (Eds.), Multiliteracies and technology enhanced education: Social practice and the global classroom (p. 215). Hershey, PA.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

In reading Multiliteracies and technology enhanced education by Pullen & Cole, there have been definitions of literacy presented as well as cases made for using technology in the classroom. These cases have been backed by studies the authors have chosen to present. One thing a majority of the studies show is that teachers are just at the tip of the iceberg when it comes to transforming student’s practice. Generally it has been teachers using a technology tool or program in order for students to complete a traditional literacy task on a computer – for example a writing task using MS Word. There is so much more that can happen and take place. Teachers and educators need to be able to see the value of a tool and how it can help students produce a multimodal text, one that has an authentic purpose for it’s creation.

I will admit that there have been times when teaching that I was guilty of simply having the students use the computer to complete a task. In saying this, I do recognize that in the beginning when learning to use a tech tool, for both teachers and students, it’s use can begin as a substitution for an already existing practice.

Interestingly I came across Blaming and Shaming Teachers for Low-Level Tech Practices by Bill Ferriter. The article contributes to what I have mentioned here and provides additional thoughts and ideas around technology use within the classroom.

A challenge for myself and other educators to overcome in order for technology to be more than a “tool” to complete traditional literacy practices and tasks and to transform the ways in which students are learning and producing texts.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s